This Is England – why I’m not (and will not) be watching ’90

There is no denying that director Shane Meadows created something special with his 2006 feature film This Is England. With a cast full of bright up-and-comers and an exploration into the trials and tribulations of post-Thatcher Britain, Meadows was sure to create a movie full of memorable moments. With a combination of wit and stark realism, This Is England quickly became a cult classic and received not only a positive response from cinema-goers, but critics too. Thomas Turgoose was an absolute find as well, and he shone bright with emotion and naivety and instantly became a favourite for me. He went on to star in Somers Town and Eden Lake and showed himself to be a true young talent. So, come This Is England ’86 I was more than up for another round of Woody (Joe Gilgun), Lol (Vicky McClure) and Milky (Andrew Shim).

the one-sheet for this is england

the one-sheet for this is england

The six-part series started strong, and no doubt created nostalgia for viewers from that decade. But the brutal subject matter turned off many viewers, including me. ’88 came two years later, and was just that little bit more engaging, but still as miserable as ever. Although the cast are an impressive ensemble, that in itself wasn’t enough to sway me to jump to Channel 4 for the premiere episode of ’90. Following the first installment Facebook and Twitter were gleaming with positive words from home-viewers and I felt inclined to give it a watch on 40D. Then came the second episode, and the revelation that the creators behind the show have featured more hard-hitting brutality. Again, towards women. And this had led me to ask, once again, is it necessary?

Meadows’ feature was a film of two halves. The first, a somewhat up-beat montage of 1980’s Britain and the sub-culture that came with it. The second, a dark look at the underbelly of the Skinhead lifestyle and the racism that sat somewhere among it. Stephen Graham as Combo was a terrifying enigma of a man who encompassed, what appeared to be, the anger of a nation. Many believed the preaching dialogue of the character to be a little over the top. Others were impressed with the intelligence of the script and the bravery of Meadows as a director to challenge his audience with the shocking – and hard to watch – final scene that he delivered. I sat with the latter half, and have gone back to the film many times, never to be let down or disappointed by just how strong the feature is nearly ten years later.

You are probably asking, what’s the difference between the brutality of racist violence in the film, to the sexual abuse themes and rape scene in the series? Well, there’s a big difference. This Is England carried with it so many ideological messages, from the sides of the characters we, as an audience, grew to love, and those that we grew to hate. I, and collectively as an audience, us, took something away following the first viewing of the film and I still remember the effect it had on people I know. When I asked a friend recently about her views on the new series (when I was trying to figure out just how far Meadows had gone this time), she replied, ‘Well, I can’t tell you what happened, apart from I felt miserable afterwards.’. And that, simply, reflects my problem with what this legacy has turned into: misery.

A lot of people will disagree with me, and that’s the brilliance of film and television. It’s emotive, effective, and people respond in completely different ways. But some things are best left alone, and now I seem to remember the weaknesses of the social-realist franchise, rather than the strengths of the independent movie that first moved audiences everywhere.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “This Is England – why I’m not (and will not) be watching ’90

  1. Thanks for your great review! Just wanted to give my opinion on the rape depiction:

    I think it’s natural to revolted as a woman by multiple brutal rape scenes, but as you say the film depicts racist violence in a no less brutal way and our reaction as individuals to the two, separate depictions can’t be controlled by Meadows. TIE 86, 88 and 90 do indeed leave a bitter taste in the mouth but I am personally so glad Meadows doesn’t shy away from depicting violence against women in complex female characters whom we love. I think you’re right to mention the fact that the film revolves around post Faulklands War Thatcherite Britain which shapes the violence as a product of displaced citizens needing an outlet and looking to immigrants as scapegoats (see Nigel Farage), but as is reflected in the names of each, the TIE series move with the times and become about the legacy of the social destruction of the working classes in the 80’s. Woody is encouraged to social climb in the job he hates and aspire to be middle class as his parents do…. Combo is released from prison and is still in love with Lol, still wanting to protect and risk everything for her and repentant, wanting to ‘do a good thing’ …. But yes, the stand-out storyline is undoubtedly the harrowing relationship between Lol and her dad.

    I don’t think the spectacle lies in the rape but in the mental health problems Lol faces as a result. The haunting, almost gothic aftermath where she sees her dad everywhere, her expressions…. I’m glad we were all disgusted by the scenes. Women being raped by family members, coping with mental health issues and suicide are all realities and Lol’s character is so bloody amazing and moving that we can’t get the memory out of our heads.

    • I didn’t write this article to try and diminish what Meadows is setting out to achieve as a director and writer, but simply to say that following the film, the series doesn’t really match up. The themes covered are certainly interesting, but aren’t projected in the captivating way in which the film was able to convey them. Thanks for your comment!

      • Ah ok thanks for clarifying, I read it as ‘some things are better left alone’ in relation to the violence against women. I prefer the film format too – I think putting it all into a TV format lost something special to necessitate the format.

      • That wasn’t what I meant at all, but there’s creating a response – one which has a genuine message – and then overdoing something. But we all have our different opinions, as I said in my article, which is what’s great about film and television criticism.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s